Broadening Participation of Students with Disabilities in STEM
Content in the following articles provide guidance regarding the selection and implementation of evidence-based practices and promising interventions for DO-IT projects.
AccessSTEM. (2007). AccessSTEM: Building capacity to include students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Seattle: ÌÇÐÄÔ´´.
Alston, R. J., Bell, T. J. & Hampton, J. L. (2002).ÌýLearning disability and career entry into the sciences: A critical analysis of attitudinal factors.ÌýJournal of Career Development,Ìý28(4), 263-275.
Ampaw, F., & Jaeger, A. (2011).ÌýUnderstanding the factors affecting degree completion of doctoral women in the science and engineering fields.ÌýNew Directions for Institutional Research, 152,Ìý59-73.Ìý
Blaser, B., Ladner, R., & Burgstahler, S. (2016). Lessons learned: Engaging students with disabilities on a national scale. In proceedings from RESPECT '16: Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology. IEEE.
Blaser, B., Steele, K.M., & Burgstahler, S.B. (2015). Including universal design in engineering courses to attract diverse students. Proceedings from the ASEE Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
Bremer, C. D., Kachgal, M., & Schoeller, K. (2003). . National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Research to Practice Brief, 2(1).
Burgstahler, S. (2015). Opening doors or slamming them shut? Online learning practices and students with disabilities. Social Inclusion, 3(6), 69-79.
Burgstahler, S., Ladner, R., & Bellman, S. (2012).Ìý.ÌýACM Inroads,Ìý3(4), 42-48.
Burgstahler, S., Ladner, R., & Comden, D. (2008).Ìý. In ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 12-15). Milwaukee, WI: IEEE.
Burgstahler, S.,ÌýStefanich, G., & Stodden, R. (2014). College students with disabilities in STEM: Expanding opportunities by enhancing communication of evidence-based information with stakeholders. In B. S.ÌýDuerstock & C. A.ÌýShingledecker, Eds. (pp. 48-60).ÌýFrom college to careers: Fostering inclusion of persons with disabilities in STEM. ÌÇÐÄÔ´´, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved fromÂ
Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering (CEOSE). (2013). Broadening participation in America's STEM workforce. The 2011-2012 Biennial Reports to Congress. NSF: Author. Retrieved from
Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering, and Technology Development (2000, September).ÌýLand of plenty: Diversity as America's competitive edge in science, engineering and technology. ÌÇÐÄÔ´´, DC: Author.
Dunn, C., Rabren, K. S, Taylor, S. L, & Dotson, C. K. (2012). Assisting students with high-incidence disabilities to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.ÌýIntervention in School and Clinic, 48(1), 47-54.
Friedman, A. (Ed.) (2008). . Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Grout, I. (2015). Supporting access to STEM subjects in higher education for students with disabilities using remote laboratories. In the proceedings from REV '15: Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation,Ìý7-13.
Kortering, L., McClannon, T., & Braziel, P. (2005). What algebra and biology students have to say about universal design for learning. National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Research to Practice Brief, 4(2).
Ladner, R.Ìý(Ed.) (2011). Broadening Participation. [Special Issue].ÌýACM Transactions on Computing Education,Ìý11(3).
Ladner, R. (2009).Ìý.ÌýCommunications of the ACM,Ìý52(12), 22.
Ladner, R. E. (2009).Ìý.ÌýComputing Research News,Ìý21(2).
Ladner, R., & Burgstahler, S. (2017). Expanding the pipeline: Broadening participation in computing fields by preparing more professionals with disabilities. Computing Research News, 29(5), 55-58.
Ladner, R., & Burgstahler, S. (2015). Increasing the participation of individuals with disabilities in computing. Communications of the ACM, 58(12), 33-36.
Ladner, R., & Israel, M. (2016). "For all" in "computer science for all."Â Communications of the ACM, 9, 26-28.
Ladner, R. & Stefik, A. (2017, June).Ìý.ÌýSIGACCESS Newsletter, 118.
Ladner, R., &Â VanDeGrift, T. (2011).Ìý,ÌýACM Transactions,Ìý11(2).
Ladner, R., & VanDeGrift, T. (2011).Ìý,ÌýACM Transactions,Ìý11(3).
Martin, J. K., Stumbo, N. J., Martin, L. G., Collins, K. D., Hedrick, B. N., Nordstrom, D., & Peterson, M. (2011). Recruitment of students with disabilities: Exploration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.ÌýJournal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(4), 285-299.
Moriarty, M.A. (2007). Inclusive pedagogy: Teaching methodologies to reach diverse learners in science instruction. Equity and Excellence in Education, 40(3), 252-265.
Lee, A. (2011). A comparison of postsecondary science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) enrollment for students with and without disabilities.ÌýCareer Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34(2), 72-82.
Lee, A. (2014). Students with disabilities choosing science technology engineering and math (STEM) majors in postsecondary institutions.ÌýJournal of Postsecondary Education and Disability,Ìý27(3), 261-272.
Taylor, V., & Ladner, R. (2012).Ìý,ÌýComputing Research News,Ìý24(2), 2.
White, J. L., & Massiha, G. H. (2015). Strategies to increase representation of students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM).ÌýInternational Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education,Ìý4(3), 89-93.